Skip to main content

Duncan v. State

Citations

  • 337 Ark. 306
  • 987 S.W.2d 721
  • 1999 Ark. LEXIS 188

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that a law is in violation of the ex post facto clause if it is retroactive and disadvantages the accused

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.