Duncan v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[i]f the trial court finds after appropriate investigation that the transcript of the digital recording of the proceedings was incorrect, then a correction to the transcript should be created”
• reversing and remanding for the trial court to clarify the sentence where the Fifth District suspected that either the transcript was incorrect or the trial court simply misspoke when announcing the sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Angel L. Santiago, Jr. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-09-01· cited 1×
• Marcus Tremayne Williams v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2026-06-10

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ashley v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2003-01-09· cited 189×
• Williams v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2007-05-17· cited 165×
• Comtois v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-01-07· cited 11×
• Chapman v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-07-31· cited 5×
• Franklin v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-09-19· cited 3×