Duncan v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “multiple confessions by an accused cannot corroborate each other.”
• “When we determine whether the trial judge committed an error in admitting or rejecting evidence or in striking out or refusing to strike out evidence previously admitted, we do so on the basis of the record as of the time the ruling was made, not on the basis of facts later developed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Costello
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1991-12-10· cited 28×
• Grimm v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2016-05-04· cited 23×
• Key-El v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1998-05-26· cited 22×
• State v. Aten
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1995-08-22· cited 16×
• Raynor v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2011-09-29· cited 15×
• People v. Ward
  Superior Court of The Virgin Islands· 2010-07-23

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Von Lusch v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1977-01-31· cited 92×
• Daeche v. United States
  Second Circuit· 1918-03-14· cited 86×
• Cooper v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1959-06-08· cited 44×
• Bagley v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1963-06-19· cited 34×
• Bradbury v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1964-01-30· cited 33×
• Lemons v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1981-09-01· cited 24×
• Ewell v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1962-05-18· cited 21×
• Zink v. Zink
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1957-12-23· cited 15×