Ninth Circuit· 6/24/2008
Duncan v. Ornoski
Citations
- 528 F.3d 1222
- 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 13308
- 2008 WL 2498104
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that 42 GARDING V. MONTANA DEP’T OF CORR. the duty to consult with an expert is particularly important “when the prosecutor’s expert witness testifies about pivotal evidence” and when counsel “has no knowledge or expertise about the field”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Reinhardt, Gould, Paez
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. AkbarCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2015-08-19· cited 174×
- Crittenden v. AyersNinth Circuit· 2010-11-02· cited 151×
- Robinson v. SchriroNinth Circuit· 2010-02-22· cited 103×
- United States v. PriceNinth Circuit· 2009-05-21· cited 85×
- Runningeagle v. SchriroNinth Circuit· 2016-06-10· cited 84×
- Richter v. HickmanNinth Circuit· 2009-08-10· cited 72×
- Smith v. MahoneyNinth Circuit· 2010-07-13· cited 67×
- Pinholster v. AyersNinth Circuit· 2009-12-09· cited 66×
- Sechrest v. IgnacioNinth Circuit· 2008-12-05· cited 56×
- Showers v. BeardThird Circuit· 2011-03-28· cited 37×
- Hooman Panah v. Kevin ChappellNinth Circuit· 2019-08-21· cited 24×
- People v. NewmillerColorado Court of Appeals· 2014-07-03· cited 23×
- Johnson v. United StatesN.D. Iowa· 2012-03-22· cited 21×
- State v. WhittakerSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2009-06-03· cited 17×
- Newmiller v. RaemischTenth Circuit· 2017-12-18· cited 17×
- Lee v. LampertD. Oregon· 2009-03-24· cited 8×
- Gentry v. SinclairW.D. Washington· 2008-09-15· cited 8×
- Madrigal v. YatesC.D. California· 2009-09-03· cited 8×
- Stermer v. WarrenE.D. Michigan· 2018-12-20· cited 5×
- Smith v. MahoneyNinth Circuit· 2010-03-05· cited 4×
Cites
34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court· 2003-06-26· cited 5,961×
- McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court· 1970-05-04· cited 5,113×
- Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court· 1997-06-23· cited 4,248×
- Rompilla v. BeardSupreme Court· 2005-06-20· cited 1,891×
- William George Bonin v. Arthur Calderon, as Warden of San Quentin State Prison James Rowland, Director of the California Department of CorrectionsNinth Circuit· 1995-06-28· cited 1,060×
- People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1987-10-13· cited 613×
- Carlos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1983-12-12· cited 473×
- Sheldon Sanders v. John Ratelle, Warden Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General of the State of CaliforniaNinth Circuit· 1994-04-04· cited 370×
- Benjamin Wai Silva v. Jeanne S. Woodford, Warden, San Quentin State PrisonNinth Circuit· 2002-02-22· cited 284×
- United States v. Tyrone Anthony GrayThird Circuit· 1989-06-22· cited 247×
- Ayers v. BelmontesSupreme Court· 2006-11-13· cited 244×
- Jesus Avila v. George M. Galaza, Warden Attorney General of the State of CaliforniaNinth Circuit· 2002-07-22· cited 207×
- Alcala v. WoodfordNinth Circuit· 2003-06-27· cited 204×
- People v. DuncanCalifornia Supreme Court· 1991-05-23· cited 182×
- Fred Berre Douglas v. Jeanne S. Woodford, Warden, of Rswl California State Prison at San QuentinNinth Circuit· 2003-01-24· cited 170×
- Victor Eugene Rios v. Teresa Rocha, WardenNinth Circuit· 2002-07-31· cited 164×
- Michael Wayne Jennings v. Jeanne Woodford, Warden of the California State Prison at San QuentinNinth Circuit· 2002-05-10· cited 150×
- Brian Keith Lord,petitioner-Appellee v. Tana Wood, Superintendent, Brian Keith Lord v. Tana Wood, SuperintendentNinth Circuit· 1999-07-14· cited 122×
- Warren Wesley Summerlin v. Dora B. Schriro, Director of Arizona Department of CorrectionsNinth Circuit· 2005-10-17· cited 121×
Other cases named Duncan v. Ornoski
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.