Skip to main content
· 3/31/2005

Duncan v. Neal (In Re Neal)

Citations

  • 324 B.R. 365
  • 2005 Bankr. LEXIS 510
  • 2005 WL 756830

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the Tenth Circuit in Fowler Bros. v. Young (In re Young), 91 F.3d 1367 (10th Cir.-1996
  • “The Tenth Circuit has taken a very narrow view of the concept of fiduciary duty under this section.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: T.M. Weaver

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.