Duncan v. Duncan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court erroneously awarded temporary attorney’s fees and costs without determining that the amounts sought were reasonable and without giving the appellant an opportunity to challenge their reasonableness
• recognizing that an award of temporary attorney’s fees and costs is based on an assessment of need and ability to pay as well as the reasonableness of the fees and costs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Safford v. Safford
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-12-14· cited 13×
• Kasm v. Kasm
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-05-19· cited 11×
• Newman v. Newman
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-09-18· cited 7×
• DEBRA A. JOOSTE v. MICHAEL W. JOOSTE
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-05-08· cited 3×
• Rosaler v. Rosaler
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-05-10· cited 3×
• Routh v. Thompson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-02-29· cited 2×
• Denise Chianese v. Gregory A. Brady
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-08-05

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Nichols v. Nichols
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1988-02-04· cited 43×
• Robbie v. Robbie
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-12-18· cited 37×
• Armstrong v. Armstrong
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-09-08· cited 22×