Duncan v. Combs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a “plaintiff cannot proceed on an IIED claim where the alleged conduct makes out a claim for another tort for which emotional distress damages would be available” (citations omitted)
• explaining that a “plaintiff cannot proceed on an IIED claim where the alleged conduct makes out a claim for another tort for which emotional distress damages would be available” (citations omitted)
• explaining that a “plaintiff cannot proceed on an IIED claim where the alleged conduct makes out a claim for another tort for which emotional distress damages would be available” (citations omitted)
• “To the extent the basis for this claim [wrongful discharge in violation of public policy] is the same as that for his Title VII and KCRA claims, it is preempted and subsumed by those more specific laws.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).