Skip to main content
· 9/24/1990

Duncan v. Cannon

Citations

  • 561 N.E.2d 1147
  • 204 Ill. App. 3d 160
  • 149 Ill. Dec. 451
  • 1990 Ill. App. LEXIS 1455

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • party’s failure to strictly abide by a municipal ordinance did not operate as a bar to recovery for breach of contract
  • plaintiff’s failure to comply with municipal ordinance did not preclude recovery for breach of contract
  • party’s failure to strictly abide by a municipal ordinance did not operate as a bar to recovery for breach of contract
  • \our courts have continually reiterated that the proof that ... the defendant ... agreed to pay for them must be by clear and convincing evidence.\
  • \It is well settled that the burden of establishing [the five requirements for out-of-scope work] is that plaintiff's burden and evidence of general discussion will not supply all of these elements.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Manning

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.