· 9/24/1990
Duncan v. Cannon
Citations
- 561 N.E.2d 1147
- 204 Ill. App. 3d 160
- 149 Ill. Dec. 451
- 1990 Ill. App. LEXIS 1455
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- party’s failure to strictly abide by a municipal ordinance did not operate as a bar to recovery for breach of contract
- plaintiff’s failure to comply with municipal ordinance did not preclude recovery for breach of contract
- party’s failure to strictly abide by a municipal ordinance did not operate as a bar to recovery for breach of contract
- \our courts have continually reiterated that the proof that ... the defendant ... agreed to pay for them must be by clear and convincing evidence.\
- \It is well settled that the burden of establishing [the five requirements for out-of-scope work] is that plaintiff's burden and evidence of general discussion will not supply all of these elements.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Manning
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.