Duncan v. Board of Education

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Fact that plaintiff was “quarrelsome and insulting” is not admissible in mitigation of damages where defamatory words were that “the plaintiff was a rogue and had stolen the defendant’s sheep”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).