Duncan v. Belcher

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that plaintiffs were “customers” under RFPA because they “are ‘persons’ 16 who ‘utilized’ a ‘service of a financial institution,’ and that service was related to “‘an account 17 maintained in [their] name.’”
• definition of customer turns on “whether the individual maintains the financial account in his or her name only”
• definition of customer turns on \whether the individual maintains the financial account in his or her name only\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).