Duncan v. Augter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the treatment or operation whose failure provides the basis of the plaintiffs complaint cannot provide the basis for equitable estoppel
• the treatment or operation whose failure provides the basis of the plaintiff's complaint cannot provide the basis for equitable estoppel
• passive wording in statute of limitations regarding when injury is discovered or reasonably should have been discovered did not specify whose discovery triggered time limitation
• discussing legislative history of ORS 12.110(4)
• discussing legislative history of ORS 12.110(4)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Gaston v. Parsons
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1994-01-06· cited 169×
• Securities-Intermountain, Inc. v. Sunset Fuel Co.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1980-06-03· cited 84×
• Tomlinson v. George
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 2005-06-30· cited 37×
• Hoffner v. Johnson
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 2003-05-12· cited 29×
• Duncan v. Augter
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1983-03-16· cited 26×
• Jones v. Salem Hospital
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1988-10-05· cited 15×
• Skuffeeda v. St. Vincent Hospital & Medical Center
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-01-29· cited 8×
• State v. Mullins
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2012-08-23· cited 5×
• McKechnie v. Stanke
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-08-04· cited 2×
• Sonsteng v. Dominican Sisters of Ontario, Inc.
  D. Oregon· 2009-05-28· cited 1×
• Asher v. Hald
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1990-03-07· cited 1×