Skip to main content
· 3/22/1977

Duncan v. Andrus

Citations

  • 517 F. Supp. 1
  • 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16776

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dismissing unjust enrichment claim where “it appears there was 6 an express contract related to the conduct at issue”
  • in one-way arbitration agreement, itself unconscionable, the 5 “arbitration provision was a needle in a haystack”
  • “Failure to state a claim is a defect in the plaintiff’s 3 claim; it is not an additional set of facts that bars recovery notwithstanding the plaintiff’s 4 valid prima facie case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schwarzer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.