Dunbar v. Gabbert

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that there \c[ould] be no dispute\ that defendant acted as proprietor because it funded project
• holding that an ordinance requiring bidders on county projects to participate in an apprenticeship program was “sufficiently tailored” to the county’s proprietary interest because it only applied to bidders on the county’s projects
• in assessing whether a county’s proprietary interest was “specifically tailored” under Sage, “the crucial factor” was whether the county’s code requiring participation in an apprenticeship program “appl[ied] to every construction project” in the county

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).