Skip to main content
· 9/12/1995

Dumont v. Shaw's Supermarkets, Inc.

Citations

  • 664 A.2d 846
  • 1995 Me. LEXIS 213

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • plaintiff asserted that defendant’s mode of operation, namely, its display of unpackaged, bulk candy, led to her accident
  • party is entitled to jury instruction that is correct statement of law supported by facts, as long as instruction is not misleading and has not already been covered by charge
  • plaintiff need not prove that store had notice of specific condition giving rise to plaintiffs injury as long as plaintiff can establish that store was aware of recurrence of hazardous condition on premises
  • “A plaintiff does not have to prove that the store owner had actual notice of the specific condition giving rise to the injury if the plaintiff can establish that the store owner was aware of the risk of a recurrence of a hazardous condition of the premises.”
  • chocolate-covered peanut from bulk, unwrapped candy bin

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wathen, Roberts, Glassman, Clifford, Rudman, Lipez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.