· 6/20/2000
Dumoff v. Spencer
Citations
- 754 A.2d 1280
- 2000 Pa. Super. 176
- 2000 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1150
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that four-month delay is not prompt
- prejudice is not a separate element examined by the courts if a petitioner did not establish all three requirements of the test to open the default judgment
- petition to open default judgment may be granted only when it is promptly filed; trial court properly denied petition to open when party waited eleven months to file petition to open default
- “after reviewing applicable case law regarding the untimely filing of a petition to open judgment, we find that prejudice is not a separate element examined by the courts when [defendant] did not establish all three requirements of the test to open the default judgment”
- finding a four-month delay was untimely
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Popovich, Todd, Brosky
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.