Skip to main content
· 11/23/1987

Dume v. Elkcom Co., Inc.

Citations

  • 533 A.2d 1063
  • 368 Pa. Super. 280
  • 1987 Pa. Super. LEXIS 9622

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding “privity of contract is not required between the general contractor and the actual employer of the injured workman for purposes of liability for workmen’s compensation benefits”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cirillo, Johnson, Montgomery

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.