Skip to main content
· 9/11/1989

Dumas v. Stocker

Citations

  • 213 Cal. App. 3d 1262
  • 262 Cal. Rptr. 311
  • 1989 Cal. App. LEXIS 928

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Plaintiff made no effort to introduce evidence of defendant’s wealth, and instead relied on innuendo and improper argument to garner the award” (footnote omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Froehlich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.