Skip to main content
· 12/11/1967

Dumas v. California

Citations

  • 389 U.S. 1010

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • en banc court explicitly rejected reasoning relied on in panel decision that “the scope of jurisdiction for section 1001 purposes follows the federal government’s access to information”
  • “A statement is considered material if it has the propensity to influence agency action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.