Dultz v. Velez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that section 1396p(c)(1) is couched in mandatory, rights-creating language that imposes a binding obligation on the States as to how they can assess an ineligibility penalty against the individual
• stating that O’Neill “limit[s] Younger ’s application to coercive administrative proceedings only”
• \conclu[ding] that § 1396p(c)(1) creates an individually enforceable right\
• \conclu[ding] that § 1396p(c)(1) creates an individually enforceable right\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).