Dulseena J. Leonard, Claimant-Appellant v. Hershel W. Gober, Acting Secretary of Veterans Affairs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that this court was barred from considering the veteran’s arguments regarding application of equita- ble tolling to the facts of her case
• dismissing appeal that involved only “the application of the law of equitable tolling to the facts of the case” for lack of subject matter jurisdiction
• finding lack of jurisdic tion “to consider [Petitioner’s] arguments regarding application of equitable tolling to the facts of her case”
• dismissing appeal because “we lack[ed] jurisdiction to consider the application of equitable tolling” to the facts of the case, which included determining whether untimely filing of the veteran’s appeal was “not due to neglect but rather to events beyond her control”
• dismissing appeal because “we lack[ed] jurisdiction to consider the application of equitable tolling” to the facts of the case, which included determining whether untimely filing of the veteran’s appeal was “not due to neglect but rather to events be- yond her control”
• “Section 7292(d)(2) expressly bars us from reviewing chal- lenges to the application of law to the facts of a particular case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).