Skip to main content
· 6/15/1961

Dulnikowski v. Stanziano

Citations

  • 195 Pa. Super. 508
  • 172 A.2d 182
  • 1961 Pa. Super. LEXIS 669

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding “[t]he mere fact that the plaintiff suffered from senility . . . did not render him incompetent to testify[;]” requiring trial court to determine whether witness had sufficient intelligence to comprehend transaction at issue
  • finding, in civil cases, “[t]he general rule is that the testimony of a witness suffering from an illness affecting mentality is admissible if he has sufficient understanding to apprehend the obligation of an oath, and be capable of giving a correct account of the matters [at issue.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Montgomery, Eevin, Weight, Woodside, Watkins, Montgomeey, Flood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.