Dulles v. H. D. Crippen Mfg. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding where transaction prices were based on improper purchaser classification “all of the requirements for accrual of appellant’s cause of action under the facts of this case had been met on January 1, 1974, the date the overcharging commenced as a result of the misclassification”
• “If the case before us was, as was Johnson, supra, a ‘plain’ overcharge case, we would find appellant’s position acceptable”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).