Dull v. Ohio Student Loan Commission (In Re Dull)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “the fact [that] a debtor received no educational benefit from the loans does not exclude him from [section 523(a)(8)’s] provisions”
• “The plain language of § 523(a)(8) does not limit applicability to educational loans on which the student is the obligor”
• language of § 523(a)(8) is all-inclusive and fact that debtor received no educational benefit from loan did not excuse her from provisions of that section

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).