Dulany v. Carnahan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiffs’ release from custody renders appeal moot when injunctive relief is the only remedy inmates pursued for deliberate indifference to serious medical needs
• holding that evidence indicating merely “possible negligence . . . is insufficient to supply an inference of deliberate indifference”
• “[S]howing that another physician might have ordered different tests and treatment does not show deliberate indifference.”
• “[S]howing that another physician might have ordered different tests and treatment does not show deliberate indifference.”
• holding a prisoner must show defendants “ignored an acute or escalating condition” or the delay “adversely affected the prognosis”
• holding that summary judgment in favor of the defendants was not in error as to inmate-plaintiffs Anderson and Allen, where neither Anderson nor Allen submitted verifying medical evidence indicating that a delay in treatment of her acute cardiac condition resulted in an adverse effect

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).