Dulaney v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• there is no constitutional requirement that the trial court's finding of manifest necessity be explicit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Clancy v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2003-06-27· cited 20×
• Dulaney v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1981-02-24

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Arizona v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 1978-02-21· cited 2,314×
• Shadle v. State
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1967-01-26· cited 149×
• Woods v. State
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1978-09-08· cited 76×
• Windham v. State
  Alabama Court of Appeals· 1961-04-25· cited 7×