Skip to main content
· 5/1/2012

Dulaney v. INMAR, INC.

Citations

  • 725 S.E.2d 473
  • 220 N.C. App. 415

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that employee was not employed at the time commissions were paid, as required
  • rejecting unjust enrichment claim when plan language clearly stated that employee had no right to recover commissions that did not come due until after her employment ended

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.