Skip to main content
· 8/25/2015

Dukore v. District of Columbia

Citations

  • 419 U.S. App. D.C. 103
  • 799 F.3d 1137
  • 92 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 504
  • 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 14935
  • 2015 WL 5022397

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \It is [plaintiffs'] burden to show that the particular right in question-narrowly described to fit the factual pattern confronting the officers-was clearly established.\
  • “[W]hen a district court resolves some, but not all, of the claims in a complaint, the judgment is generally non-final and non-appealable.”
  • “It is [the plaintiffs’] burden to show that the particular right in question—narrowly described to fit the factual pattern confronting the officers—was clearly established.” (internal citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tatel, Millett, Sentelle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.