· 8/25/2015
Dukore v. District of Columbia
Citations
- 419 U.S. App. D.C. 103
- 799 F.3d 1137
- 92 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 504
- 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 14935
- 2015 WL 5022397
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \It is [plaintiffs'] burden to show that the particular right in question-narrowly described to fit the factual pattern confronting the officers-was clearly established.\
- “[W]hen a district court resolves some, but not all, of the claims in a complaint, the judgment is generally non-final and non-appealable.”
- “It is [the plaintiffs’] burden to show that the particular right in question—narrowly described to fit the factual pattern confronting the officers—was clearly established.” (internal citation omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tatel, Millett, Sentelle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.