Dukes v. State
Citations
- 80 Miss. 353
Syllabus
<p>1. Criminal Law. Evidence. Death of Witness. Subsequent trial. Identity of issues.</p> <p>The testimony of a witness delivered in his life time on a preliminary trial of one charged with crime, who had full opportunity to cross-examine him, is admissible, after his death, on a subsequent trial, and can be proved by persons able to state its material substance, where, but only where, the issues are substantially identical.</p> <p>2. Same. Bobbery. Murder.</p> <p>The issues involved in charges of robbery and murder are not substantially identical, although the death resulted from blows inflicted in the perpetration of the robbery.</p>
Judges: Whitfield
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Crary v. SpragueNew York Supreme Court· 1834-05-15· cited 54×
- Brown v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1873-04-05· cited 35×
- United States v. MacombU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Illinois· 1851-07-15· cited 25×
- Le Baron v. CrombieMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1817-07-15· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.