Dukehart v. Coughman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that open and obvious doctrine exonerating an owner or occupier of land from duty to warn those entering the land did not extend to independent contractor
• “Issues of comparative negligence are for the jury to resolve unless the evidence is so compelling that reasonable minds can reach but one conclusion.”
• “[T]he open and obvious nature of the hazard itself serves as a warning.”
• \the open and obvious nature of the hazard itself serves as a warning\
• “a landowner’s liability in tort”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).