Duke v. Whatley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming trial court‘s denial of specific performance because first-refusal did not specifically provide a mechanism for determining holder's purchase price
• specific performance on option contract may be granted if option contains all material and essential terms
• “[Without knowledge of the parties!’] intent of an essential term, this Court, and any court, is unable to determine what performance should be required.”
• refusing to enforce a first-refusal contract with a missing price

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).