Skip to main content

Duke v. State

Citations

  • 77 Ark. App. 263
  • 72 S.W.3d 907
  • 2002 Ark. App. LEXIS 277

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that where a dog is clearly capable of physical harm, the fact finder could reasonably infer that it was used as a deadly weapon

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Agree, Bird, Hart, Neal

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.