Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 5/1/2002
Duke v. State
Citations
- 77 Ark. App. 263
- 72 S.W.3d 907
- 2002 Ark. App. LEXIS 277
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that where a dog is clearly capable of physical harm, the fact finder could reasonably infer that it was used as a deadly weapon
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Agree, Bird, Hart, Neal
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.