Duke v. Rolls-Royce Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding it premature on motion to dismiss to determine whether mortgage agreements cover the relevant subject matter of plaintiffs’ unjust enrichment claim
• finding similar argument “unpersuasive as Casey alleges Firstlnsure received a commission from the flood insurance MidFirst force-placed on his property. Thus, albeit indirectly, Firstlnsure received a benefit from Casey’s escrow funds or increased indebtedness”
• kickback scheme would likely mislead a reasonable consumer as to the amount of flood insurance he was required to maintain under the contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).