Skip to main content
· 10/15/1889

Duke v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.

Citations

  • 99 Mo. 347

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that trial court sustainably exercised its discretion in ruling that, if defendant chose to expose witness’s bias against him, State would be permitted to elicit from witness basis for bias
  • ruling that the defendant could challenge the trial court’s in limine ruling on appeal where he supported his motion “with an explanation of the line of questioning he sought to pursue during cross-examination” and renewed his request at trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brace

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.