Skip to main content
· 11/11/1915

Duke v. City of Anniston

Citations

  • 14 Ala. App. 675

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the court had \a choice about the degree of relevance to assign to\ postdecisional documents included in an administrative record
  • explaining that documents submitted to the GAO may be postdecision documents that are not part of the record for review
  • stating that while the Court has no choice but to accept post decisional agency statements in the GAO record, it has a choice regarding the degree of relevance to assign to them
  • describing the administrative record in a post-award protest as “the record before the decision maker at the time of the final award”
  • considering, and ultimately denying, the plaintiffs motion to “limit” the administrative record
  • describing the circumstances in which this court may supplement the administrative record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.