Duke Power Co. v. Rutland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the juvenile court improperly relied on facts that were extrinsic to jurisdictional judgment and for which mother lacked adequate notice
• reversing and remanding “for the court to reconsider mother’s motion [to dismiss jurisdiction],” because “the court based its decision to continue jurisdiction, in large part, on mother’s mental health, a fact extrinsic to the jurisdictional judgment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).