Duhrkop Oven Co. v. Tormay

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that entity was organ, because even though government did “not appear to exercise day-to-day control over [the entity, the government did] play an active supervisory role”
• holding that an association of private hog producers was an organ, where such association became an official industry marketing board pursuant to Alberta law after receiving approval from Alberta government
• holding that entity is organ, and explaining that the “conclusion is especially sound here given that the purpose of the entity in question is to advance the Province of Alberta’s interest”
• holding that an entity was an organ of the state, in part because the entity’s “ability to act independently” was “narrowly circumscribe[d]”
• holding that a commercial enterprise was an “organ” of the state based on the considerable control that a governmen tal body exercised over that commercial enterprise
• holding that entity was organ, because even though government did “not appear to exercise day-to-day control over [the entity, the government did] play an active supervisory role”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).