Duhart v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the preservation requirement “more precisely frames the issue, arguments, and factual record and thereby facilitates appellate review”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. T.G.
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2001-10-25· cited 63×
• Burns v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-10-06· cited 31×
• Thompson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-01-14· cited 14×
• King v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-12-07· cited 10×
• Reynolds v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-05-05· cited 10×
• Murray v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-08-16· cited 9×
• Trombley v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-03-17· cited 3×
• Kravitz v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-07-08· cited 2×
• Ashford v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-03-24· cited 1×
• State v. TG
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2001-10-25

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Counts v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-10-26· cited 96×
• Gamble v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-03-29· cited 8×
• Stinson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-04-26· cited 3×