Skip to main content
· 2/23/1996

Duggan v. Beermann

Citations

  • 544 N.W.2d 68
  • 249 Neb. 411
  • 1996 Neb. LEXIS 35

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding constitutional amendment proposed by initiative measure properly challenged after enactment
  • holding constitutional amendment proposed by initiative measure properly challenged after enactment
  • court should refuse declaratory judgment unless pleadings present justiciable controversy ripe for judicial determination
  • the “amendments may be saved only if it appears that the unconstitutional part did not constitute an inducement to the passage of the remaining amendments.”
  • \The severability analysis has not been used to revise careless drafting or to correct clerical errors.\
  • “The severability analysis has not been used to revise careless drafting or to correct clerical errors.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: White, Caporale, Fahrnbruch, Lanphier, Connolly, Gerrard, McGill, Wright

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.