Skip to main content
· 3/8/1983

Duggan-Rider Co. v. Levick

Citations

  • 32 Pa. D. & C.3d 125
  • 1983 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 115

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reasoning that “[i]n the unlikely event that the state actions are set for trial prior to adjudication of plaintiff’s appeal, plaintiff may file a motion for restoration of the injunction in the Court of Appeals”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nygaard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.