· 1/11/1983
Duggal v. Krishna
Citations
- 554 F. Supp. 1043
- 221 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 120
- 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20118
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that in the secondary meaning determination, the extent of advertising and promotion of the mark was a consideration
- where the mark in dispute was the name of a periodical, the court conducted an inquiry as to which party owner the periodical
- where the mark in dispute was the name of a periodical, the court conducted inquiry as to which party owned the periodical
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Harold H. Greene
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.