Skip to main content
· 5/31/2000

Duggal v. G.E. Capital Communications Services, Inc.

Citations

  • 96 Cal. Rptr. 2d 383
  • 81 Cal. App. 4th 81
  • 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4280
  • 2000 Daily Journal DAR 5677
  • 2000 Cal. App. LEXIS 427

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \[T]he filed rate doctrine bars all claims -state and federal -that attempt to challenge a rate that a federal agency has reviewed and filed.\
  • “The right to an accounting is derivative and depends on the validity of a plaintiff’s underlying claims.”
  • finding common law claims preempted by “filed rate doctrine”
  • accounting is derivative to the underlying claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Godoy Perez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.