Dugenske v. Dugenske

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• interpreting Wis. Stat. § 269.46 to require the showing of a meritorious defense
• declining to reverse the circuit court's finding of no excusable neglect because the record \shed[] little light\ on whether a reasonably prudent person would have acted as the negligent party did
• declining to reverse the circuit court's finding of no excusable neglect because the record \shed[] little light\ on whether a reasonably prudent person would have acted as the negligent party did
• lawyer's failure to answer complaint not \excusable neglect\ where failure was result of lawyer's misplacement of client's files while relocating his law offices
• lawyer's misplacement of client's files while relocating law offices not excusable neglect

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).