Dugas v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth.

Citations

• 2022 Ohio 1923

Syllabus

Because the Supreme Court of Ohio had dismissed appellant's habeas corpus action for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted, the trial court properly ruled that this later false imprisonment action was barred by res judicata. That bar moots appellant's argument that the Adult Parole Authority's policy of \tolling\ periods of post-release control while offenders are incarcerated out-of-state on convictions that arose before post-release control commenced is contrary to statute. Judgment affirmed motions denied.