Dugas v. Estiletts

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it was not arbitrary and capricious for the government to rescind DACA based on the belief that DACA was legally unsupportable in light of court decisions
• finding that DHS had a “reasonable basis” to conclude that DACA was unlawful based on “the DAPA litigation, the threatened legal challenge, and the Attorney General’s advisory letter”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).