Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 3/22/1961
Dugan v. State
Citations
- 360 P.2d 833
- 1961 OK CR 38
- 1961 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 146
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- failure of court to require an election or give appropriate instructions constitutes “fundamental and reversible error”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brett, Nix, Bussey
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Shapard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1967-11-20· cited 74×
- Cody v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1961-04-05· cited 66×
- Hudson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1965-02-17· cited 20×
- State v. HolcombSupreme Court of Vermont· 1991-03-29· cited 15×
- Esquibel v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1965-03-04· cited 14×
- Drake v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1988-09-02· cited 13×
- State v. BonillaSupreme Court of Vermont· 1984-05-18· cited 13×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.