Dugan v. Martel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defendant not estopped from asserting statute of limitations when no showing that the conduct actually induced plaintiff to delay bringing suit
• defendant not estopped from asserting statute of limitations when no showing that the conduct actually induced plaintiff to delay bringing suit
• where plaintiff knew of defects in defendant's installation of insulation, her negligence claim accrued on date she discovered the defects, not on date she discovered the scope of her injury
• \ignorance of a cause of action does not prevent the statute of limitations from running.\
• Statute of limitations began to run when party first noticed problem, not when plaintiff became aware of scope of injury
• estoppel may bar defendant from invoking a statute of limitations defense if defendant conducted himself in a manner that induced plaintiffs not to take timely action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).