Dugal Logging, Inc. v. Arkansas Pulpwood Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that an appellant’s noncompliance with Ark. R. App. P. — Civ. 3(e) does not render the notice automatically void
• explaining that an appellant's noncompliance with Ark. R.App. P.-Civ. 3(e) does not render the notice automatically void
• “For the reasons above, we deny River-wood’s motion to dismiss, and reassign this case to the court of appeals to decide the remaining issues.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).