Duffy v. Wharton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing distinction by refusing to express opinion on whether HUD regulations are applicable to governmental as opposed to private occupancy limits
• “Dr. Beveridge identified families (in various configurations with respect to adult household members, but with the presence of at least one or more minor children) as the protected group affected by the neutral policy—Defendant’s redevelopment plan[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).