Duffy v. Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the plaintiff “requested that the proposal be kept confidential and that [the defendant] agreed to do so”
• “Therefore, recovery based on a quasi-contract theory is mutually exclusive of a recovery based on a contract theory.”
• “Restitution for unjust enrichment is an equitable remedy, available only when there is no adequate remedy at law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).