Duffy Street S.R.O., Inc. v. Mobley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming denial of motion for a new trial because the jury was authorized to find that an easement had not been used from sometime in the 1960s until 1991 and that access to the dominant property had been barred by a fence
• “The issue of attorney fees under ... § 13-6-11 [of the Georgia Code] is a question for the jury....”
• affirmed a denial of motion for new trial following jury finding that the easement had been abandoned when, in addition to nonuse, the predecessor in title had blocked the easement with a fence.
• jury authorized to find that access easement across another’s property, which was granted through deed, had been abandoned; access road had not been used for many years, and a fence blocking entry to the road had been erected by the grantee
• jury authorized to find that access easement had been abandoned where evidence showed that no one other than trespassers had used the easement for over 20 years and the predecessor-in-title to the party claiming the easement had erected a fence across the access point

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).